Furious doesn’t even begin to describe it. Town councilors in Birmingham, England have decided to drop apostrophes from signage. This unilateral decision about signage grammar is nothing less than a declaration of war against the English language. I call for a retaliatory preemptive strike.1
I‘m appalled that people have the nerve to desecrate the English language in such a manner. It’s true that English evolves; we change the spelling of words, and we create new words to express new concepts. Yet this change is artificial and arbitrary, chosen because it supposedly clears up confusion around what a street name implies or how to locate it on a GPS.
Apostrophes seem to be a very controversial punctuation mark. Mind you, all punctuation marks have their little quirks. The comma is the overused youngest child; semicolons are the misunderstood middle child. As the oldest child, the colon tends to pick up the slack from its younger siblings. Periods are: final, definitive, and ubiquitous. Dashes and hyphens are like fraternal twins—similar-yet-different. None of these, however, attracts as much controversy as our friendly neighbourhood apostrophe. Some misguided people try to use the apostrophe to denote plurality, appending apostrophe s to the end of words. This, apparently, is called the “greengrocer’s apostrophe” (note the possessive apostrophe example).2
This annoys me.
And don’t even get me started on the debate between whether a plural possessive should be ’s or s’. I personally prefer the latter, as in “The monks’ cells were small and square.” Hardcore grammarians even debate it down to the plurality of the noun itself—i.e., “monks’” is OK, but “James’” is not, since James is a single person.
The Yahoo! news article quoted Councilor Martin Mullaney, who said:
Apostrophes denote possessions that are no longer accurate, and are not needed…. More importantly, they confuse people. If I want to go to a restaurant, I don’t want to have an A-level (high school diploma) in English to find it.
Let’s break that down into its component issues. Firstly, Mullaney contends that apostrophes denote obsolete possessions—i.e., the monarchy no longer owns “King’s Heath”, so it should just be “Kings Heath”. In other words, Mullaney wants to sacrifice historical context in order to save the cost of printing another character on a sign.
Secondly, and more troubling, is the idea that one needs a high school diploma in order to navigate streets that have apostrophes in their names. While I‘m certain that Mr. Mullaney was employing hyperbole with that remark, it implies that one needs a formal education of any sort to understand the use of an apostrophe. As far as I’m concerned, one really only needs to be literate in the English language. If you can‘t read English, you’re going to have trouble reading the street signs anyway.
If this decision stands, it sets a terrible precedent for future grammar legislation. Those of us who love the English language for the beautiful lexical syntax that it is are fast becoming an endangered species. We must stand strong and stand together in these dark times.
- [ 1 ] You may be wondering how that is possible—suffice it to say, considerable amounts of power and some time travel would be involved.
- [ 2 ] From Lynch, Guide to Grammar and Style, my favourite online resource for grammar matters.
» 5 people have an opinion
This is the saddest news I’ve heard in a long time.
Ha! The “greengrocer’s apostrophe” - I didn’t realise it had a name. I’ll have to tell my dad; the apostrophe to denote plural is his biggest peeve.
Yours in punctuation.
You linguistic elites need to switch to decaf Starbucks (or should I say Starbuck‘s?). What a fuss over a silly little apostrophe! Of course it will be far easier to navigate roads sans the confusing character, any nit could see that!
Just imagine the gridlock at the intersection of Heaven’s Gate and Hell’s End…For eons the masses idle there, uncertain which way to go, as if in grammatical purgatory.
What do the apostrophes mean, they wonder, slowly running out of petrol.
Begone, ye pesky devil, that clouds modern simple minds! Ye vestigial remain of a bygone era, puzzling reminder of when good English mattered!
And don’t forget to take all the vowels with you - who needs them in this day of the text message?
[rant]
This may be seen as racist, but I hope it isn‘t, I’m trying to make a valid point.
I believe that Birmingham has abolished the apostrophe due to the large amount “non english” people. Mainly asians and stuff.
This is England for God’s sake, and we should speak English, and not be bending over backwards for the large ammount of immigrants that we don’t need.
[/rant]
I‘ve done a follow up article to this issue called ’In Search of the Birmingham Apostrophe’
See http://martinmullaney.blogspot.com/2009/02/in-search-of-birmingham-apostrophe-in.html
I’m just glad I never mentioned that the road signs incorrectly used the abbreviation dot after St (Saint) and Rd (Road)
Leave your opinion
The Website field is optional, but you must enter your name, email address, and of course, a comment. In order to make it harder for bots to spam my blog, you need to answer a simple addition question. But if you select Remember me, then your details will be saved, and you won’t have to answer the question again.
Formatting
- Bold
**Bold text**- Italics
//Italic text//- Underline
__Underlined text__- Monospace
''Monospaced text''- Link
-
[[http://google.com/|Google search engine]]Bare URLs will automatically become links.
- Images
{{http://imageurl.com/image.png|Alternate text if the image does not load}}- Quotation
-
> This is a quotation.
> It can span multiple lines.
>
> Or even paragraphs, as long as each line has a > before it. - Unordered list
-
* List item (note two spaces preceding the asterisk)
* Second list item - Ordered list
-
- List item (note two spaces preceding the dash)
- Second list item - Definition list
-
t: Term (note two spaces preceding the t)
d: Definition (note two spaces preceding the d)
One day last year I bought a book on a school trip entitled The Secret History of the English Language by M.J. Harper. You should check it out; you would enjoy it. It’s an excellent read.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009 at 6:17 PM